Patent
Litigation
Defending innovation
in every aspect of patent disputes
Patent litigation now stands at the heart of industrial competition. The Unified Patent Court (UPC), national courts, the EPO, and the INPI each represent strategic arenas where competitive dynamics can shift, licensing negotiations can unfold, and years of R&D investment can be protected.
We design both offensive and defensive strategies for technology groups, pharmaceutical companies, industrial players, and investment funds facing multi-jurisdictional attacks. Attorneys and European Patent Attorneys (EPO representatives) work in integrated teams, combining technical analysis, procedural planning, and commercial objectives.
This coordination enables us to leverage interactions between parallel proceedings, exploit weaknesses in opposing cases, and build strong negotiating positions.
our Interventions
We act before the Unified Patent Court and national jurisdictions to pursue or defend infringement actions, obtain preliminary injunctions, file declaratory non-infringement claims, and handle FRAND disputes.rnrnEach case is developed with full awareness of concurrent proceedings, chosen forums, and commercial objectives, whether to block a launch, negotiate a license, or invalidate a vulnerable patent. Our coordination between European and national venues provides listed companies, tech scale-ups, and industrial clients with a direct operational advantage through procedural expertise.
Oppositions, appeals, limitations, and third-party observations form the administrative backbone of patent disputes. We represent clients before the EPO and INPI to invalidate competitor patents or strengthen our clients’ titles.rnrnThis administrative work supports broader litigation strategy, enabling anticipation of judicial outcomes. For industrial groups as well as innovative SMEs, we assess portfolio strength, leverage prior art, and coordinate parallel proceedings. Each office decision redefines the scope of protection and reshapes the client’s commercial flexibility.
We advise technology companies and executives on all aspects of employee inventions, from determining whether inventions fall within or outside the scope of employment to calculating fair compensation and managing disputes.rnrnPreventively, we help implement internal policies to clarify rights and reduce future litigation. In contentious phases, we protect corporate interests before the competent courts, balancing Ru0026amp;D team motivation with long-term financial risk management.
Laboratories, biotech firms, medtech companies, generic manufacturers and biosimilar producers: we protect their innovations and defend their market positions. Oppositions, supplementary protection certificates, cross-border litigation and disputes related to marketing authorisations or clinical trials all require integrated legal strategies combining patent law, health regulations and competition law.rnWe assist clients at every stage, from clinical research to commercial launches exposed to immediate challenges. For both private and public stakeholders, this integrated approach secures market access and supports Ru0026amp;D profitability.
Information technology, telecommunications, semiconductors, energy, cleantech, chemistry, materials, mechanics, and consumer goods: innovation in these sectors defines competitive advantage. Whether protecting an AI breakthrough, securing battery technology, or defending an industrial process, we tailor our strategies to each industry’s pace, standards, and market dynamics.rnrnOur sector-specific expertise strengthens the technical precision of arguments and enhances judicial credibility, ensuring that innovation remains protected across every stage of development.
Contact Us
our References
Leading generics manufacturer – Patent litigation & SPC strategies
Represents a major generics company in complex patent and SPC disputes, including invalidity and infringement actions, launch-at-risk strategies, multi-jurisdictional coordination and strategic monitoring of high-stakes EU proceedings.
Major automotive supplier – Patent litigation & employee inventions
Represents a leading global automotive supplier in high-tech patent disputes (UPC, infringement actions, unfair competition) as well as in strategic employee-invention matters, validity and freedom-to-operate analyses, and IP governance issues.
Major semiconductor player – UPC litigation & global dispute
Represents a major semiconductor company in a patent infringement action before the Paris Local Division of the UPC against a global tech group, in a unique transatlantic dispute involving parallel proceedings and the threat of EU-wide injunction, ultimately resolved through a confidential global settlement.
our Distinctions
-
(01)Chambers and Partners
2025 – Global
Pharma/Life Sciences: Intellectual Property
-
(02)Legal 500
2025 – Global
Intellectual Property : Patents
-
(03)Managing IP
2025 – Global
Patent contentious
Latest News
FAQ
Patent litigation has become a full-fledged arena for industrial competition. Since 1 June 2023, the Unified Patent Court (UPC) allows patent holders to obtain a single enforceable decision across the member states that have ratified the agreement, with a seven-year transitional period during which national courts retain concurrent jurisdiction for classic European patents. We act before the UPC and national jurisdictions to pursue or defend infringement actions, obtain preliminary injunctions, file declaratory non-infringement claims, and handle FRAND disputes. Our coordination between European and national venues provides listed companies, tech scale-ups and industrial clients with a direct operational advantage.
Administrative proceedings before patent offices (oppositions, appeals, limitations, third-party observations) form the backbone of an effective litigation strategy. Before the European Patent Office, an opposition must be filed within nine months of the publication of the mention of the grant of the patent (Article 99 of the European Patent Convention). We act before the EPO and INPI to invalidate competitor patents or strengthen our clients’ titles, leveraging prior art and coordinating parallel proceedings. Each office decision redefines the scope of protection and reshapes the client’s commercial flexibility.
Managing employee inventions is a significant asset-related challenge for technology companies. Article L. 611-7 of the French Intellectual Property Code distinguishes between service inventions (belonging to the employer, giving rise to supplementary compensation) and attributable non-service inventions (which the employer may claim ownership of in exchange for a fair price). We advise companies and executives on the qualification of inventions, the calculation of fair compensation, and the management of contentious claims. Preventively, we implement internal policies to clarify rights and reduce future litigation.
Laboratories, biotech firms, medtech companies, generic manufacturers and biosimilar producers face disputes where patent law, health regulations and competition law intersect. Regulation (EC) No 469/2009 provides for supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) extending patent protection for a maximum of five years beyond expiry. We handle oppositions, SPCs, cross-border litigation and disputes related to marketing authorizations or clinical trials. This integrated approach secures market exclusivity and supports the profitability of Ru0026amp;D investments.
Information technology, telecommunications, semiconductors, energy, cleantech, chemistry, materials, mechanics and consumer goods: in these sectors, the patent race directly determines competitive positioning. Whether protecting an AI breakthrough, securing battery technology or defending an industrial process, we tailor our litigation strategies to each industry’s pace, technical standards and market dynamics. Our sector-specific expertise strengthens the technical precision of arguments and enhances judicial credibility before both national courts and the UPC.
We design both offensive and defensive strategies for technology groups, pharmaceutical companies, industrial players and investment funds facing multi-jurisdictional attacks. Attorneys and European Patent Attorneys (EPO representatives) work in integrated teams, combining technical analysis, procedural planning and commercial objectives. This coordination enables us to leverage interactions between parallel proceedings, exploit weaknesses in opposing cases and build strong negotiating positions. From a product launch threatened by a competitor to the valuation of a portfolio before a sale, we manage patent litigation as a tool for competitiveness.